I find myself thinking today about the idea of "eternal damnation". Once again, this is something that bothers me.
The way I see it, God has eternity. This means that time is pretty well an irrelevant concept when it comes to God. After all, time is a construct of man: a construct that I believe God uses to help teach us. But back to the topic at hand...
Allow me to propose a few things as true: 1. God is Love. (and all the things that go along with love like forgiveness, mercy, and grace) 2. God is eternal. 3. Eternity never ends. 4. In the scheme of eternity, a human lifetime is the equivalent of the blink of an eye.
Now, from these truths, I propose the following question: If God is Love, how could He condemn a soul to never-ending pain and torture for things that happened in the blink of an eye? To me, this kind of thing is like a parent who, when they find that their child has stolen ten dollars out of their wallet, takes them out and beats them nearly to death. We would look at that and say, "How awful! Look at how that parent abuses their child!" We are God's children, and I should hope that He is not an abusive parent. If God wished to condemn souls to an eternity of suffering, what then was the point of giving his only begotten Son to cover our iniquities?
And so, the answer is simple. Eternal damnation was never the plan. Eternal salvation was. Not eternal salvation for the chosen few, but eternal salvation for everyone because we are all God's children. Yes, that means that we must come to terms with the fact that when (not if) we get to Heaven, we might very well meet Hitler on the other side. Now, that's a point a lot of people are going to be angry at me for. I chose one of humankind's worst examples for a reason. I chose it because I'm sure it wasn't the first time (nor would it be the last) Christ said, "Forgive them Father, they know not what they are doing." Of course, I myself find it hard to swallow that I might well see Hitler in Heaven, but then again, I'm judging from the perception of man, not the perception of God, and we all know that man perceives in the flesh, not the spirit. That's why we don't get a say in where people's souls go, after all.
I think that when we die, we go through a major perspective shift. As we are: living, breathing, and doing stupid human things on the earth, we perceive things in the flesh. It makes it very hard to see the living God in everyone because God is in the Spirit and we're not perceiving in the Spirit, we're perceiving in flesh. When we die, we are only Spirit, and thus perceive in the Spirit and in truth. I think at that moment, we finally do "know what we have done" and in knowing the truth, how could you not ask for forgiveness? Ask and ye shall receive.
Out for today.
Falx
I think a professor once said that there are basically four ways to think about hell:
ReplyDelete1) Eternal punishment (Dante's Inferno.)
2) Temporary punishment (purgatory.)
3) Eternal destruction (annihilationism)
4) Heaven and hell are the same place experienced differently.
And then there's "no hell." I'm tempted by universalism, but given all the gehenna talk Jesus did, I'm not quite comfortable with that. It also is its own kind if annihilationism to say that nothing you do in this life affects your salvation. My discontent with predestination comes into play here too.
Only other thing that intrigues me (not sure if you know this) is that the word "Hell" in the NT is gehenna or ge'hinnom (the Valley of Hinnom), which refers specifically to a former site of sacrilege that, by Jesus' time, had become literally a burning garbage dump. So, hell is a burning rubbish dump. Make of that whatever you like. :)
Since Jesus said "I am the way, the truth, and the light no one comes to the Father but by me, can a soul receive Jesus as savior after death? If so, this plays into the fourth way of thinking about hell. If not, is Gandhi in hell?
ReplyDeleteI've thought the emphasis in that passage was less on the destruction of outsiders and more on the confidence of the disciples. If you look at the surrounding stuff, Jesus isn't even mentioning anyone outside the church, but is reassuring his followers who are asking questions about "How can we know the Father?" It's more about the confidence of the Church than the status of outsiders.
ReplyDeleteFar as Gandhi goes, I think he meant both sides when he said "I love your Jesus, can't stand your Christians." I figure Christ, having experience religious persecution and imperialism, will at least have sympathy with his situation. I think heaven is full of surprises.
The way I've learned to think about salvation and theology sometimes throws monkey wrenches into other ways of thinking. I think of it more a a cosmic event than as an individual one.
I guess a deeper question is "What does it mean to be saved?"
I could go on, but dinner calls...